Our PCIe card, running Sigmix-authored firmware — scrubbing & audit, in dedicated silicon.
Explore Sigmix Guard
Every request served on-box, sealed from the internet.
See your posture
Clinical notes are the most sensitive free text a hospital holds — and exactly the material staff most want help with. Sigmix resolves that tension architecturally: the model runs on your hardware, so the notes never go anywhere to be helped with.
Ask honestly and most hospitals find clinicians and administrators already pasting work into consumer AI tools on personal accounts — because the job is hard and the tool helps. That is the real data-protection exposure, and a policy banning it has not closed it anywhere.
The instinct is to prohibit AI on clinical material. In practice that pushes usage onto personal devices and accounts you cannot see, audit or govern — and the sensitive text still leaves the building, just without a record of it.
Giving staff a sanctioned tool that runs inside the hospital removes the reason to go elsewhere. The work gets done, the data stays put, and for the first time there is an audit trail of what was asked and by whom.
Notes pasted into consumer AI on personal accounts. No audit trail, no residency control, and no way to evidence any of it to a regulator.
Models run on hospital hardware. PII scrubbed on the request path, every request audit-anchored, nothing transmitted anywhere.
Sigmix is a documentation and administration tool. It drafts, summarises, translates and answers questions across material you already hold. It does not diagnose, triage or make clinical decisions, and we would rather be clear about that than sell into a claim we cannot stand behind.
Clinical judgement stays entirely with the clinician. Anything the system produces is a draft for a person to review, correct and own.
On-device · nothing transmitted
Tidying notes, drafting letters and discharge summaries, restructuring dictated text — on the device, reviewed by the clinician.
Ask questions across your own clinical guidance and internal policy, in Arabic or English, with the source attached.
Rosters, correspondence, procurement documents and reporting for the non-clinical teams who carry most of the paperwork.
Arabic-native output for a workforce that documents in both languages, with full right-to-left throughout.
National ID, Iqama, MRN-style patterns and contact details redacted on the request path — before the model, not after the fact.
Every request hashed into a tamper-evident anchor and exportable to your SIEM — the evidence a PDPL review asks for.
The common starting point is Sigmix Zero on the desks handling the most sensitive material — medical records, HR, legal, the executive floor. The models run on the machine, so the question of transmission never arises.
Where a whole department needs shared capacity, an on-prem appliance serves the building with the same posture — sealed, zero-egress, nothing leaving the site.
Records & administration


PDPL asks you to demonstrate control, not to promise it. These are the artefacts the platform produces for that conversation.
Mapping against PDPL and NCA ECC-2:2024, released under NDA in the evidence pack. Trust Center →
Retention limits and right-to-erasure via crypto-shredding, configurable to your own records policy.
Active Directory or SSO, with capability gates set centrally and every change recorded.

The useful conversation is about scope and evidence — what staff would actually use it for, which identifiers get scrubbed, and where the audit trail lands. Bring the person who will have to answer for it under PDPL.